The "Stop LCRA" website is up!

Our new website, "LCRA Does FBG," is up and can now be accessed through this weblink. We wanted to go live before the LCRA's Fredericksburg open houses tomorrow, so the site still needs some work, but much of the content is in place. We also have a Facebook page on this issue, "The LCRA is Ruining Fredericksburg, Texas and the Hill Country; Stop Them" which you can access through this Facebook link.

For those of you who, like me until several weeks ago, have too many irons in the fire to have paid much attention to this issue, this is a critical time for the Hill Country, and we need folks who care to raise there voices on this issue and weigh in. Essentially, the LCRA (Lower Colorado River Authority) is under contract with the Texas Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to build hundreds of miles of transmission lines from wind farms in West Texas to users in the State's major metropolitan areas. While we can argue about the efficiency of bringing electricity hundreds of miles, there exists shut-in electricity generated by the wind farms and politically the process as a whole seems unstoppable.

The devil is, of course, in the details. While we are all for the use of clean energy, we also believe that care should be given to not unnecessarily impact the areas, including our Texas Hill Country, that the transmission lines travel through. The Texas Hill Country is a particularly scenic area, dependent to a large extent on tourism, and care should be taken to preserve as much of its character as is possible. We believe this proposition should be self-evident.

But there is much reason for skepticism that the LCRA is approaching this project with the care that we feel it deserves. Here in Gillespie County and Fredericksburg, the LCRA's proposed "CREZ" routes travel through beautiful scenic areas that are treasures to us and our tourists, including flirting with the Pedernales River, and the farms and ranches along it, for some five miles.

We also are concerned that the routes seem to have been devised in a way that unnecessarily impacts some land owners by moving several different directions throughout one piece of property. On our property, the proposed lines start moving from south to north along one boundary, move across the width of our property from east to west, and then move down the other property line. On our modest farm alone, the LCRA threatens to surround us and bisect us with one and one-half miles of 160 foot by 65 foot towers and transmission lines, making the majority of our farm, and our tourist cabins, worthless and unusable. Unfortunately, we are learning we are not alone. Surely the LCRA could coordinate its routes so that the lines and towers move only once across a single owner's property, right? It would seem so.

Lastly, there has been an outcry over the LCRA's use of lattice type structures, which leave a huge physical and visual footprint, rather than single pole structures (called monopoles). Recently another company used monopoles in constructing a virtually identical project through the Hill Country. They are not attractive, but are certainly more attractive and have less of a negative impact than do the lattice type structures. Despite this, the LCRA has already begun ordering materials for the lattice type structures.

Consistently, the LCRA dumps all of its lack of responsiveness on the PUC. It says that it will use monopoles rather than lattice type structures if the PUC orders it to do so (one wonders about the materials already ordered and stock-piled). It says that the PUC, not LCRA, will eventually determine what routes are selected. In our minds this is a cop-out. The PUC will ultimately choose the routes, but it will do so from preliminary routes already set out by LCRA. If the LCRA is irresponsible in laying out preliminary routes, the PUC will have only the opportunity to choose routes from those proffered by LCRA. As it looks now, the PUC will be choosing from several bad choices, and not the best choice. The LCRA should take the blame for proffering bad routes in the first place.

As to the pole choice, clearly the LCRA is bullying its way towards its own choice, and is attempting to secure this choice by ordering materials in advance of the PUC decision. How likely is it that the PUC will waste material already purchased by LCRA?

The LCRA's application on the McCamey D - Kendall - Gillespie route is due July 6, 2010. It is likely that many proposed alternatives, including the worst ones, will remain on the map. Because of deadlines, folks will face the choice of ponying up big bucks to intervene in that application proceeding without even knowing whether they will ultimately be impacted. By approaching the issue in this manner, the LCRA and PUC will limit the number of Intervenors and pit neighbor against neighbor -- when the true enemies are LCRA and the PUC.

There is a limited time to change the process. After July 6, 2010, the only way to influence the process will be to be an intervening landowner. The time for public outcry will be over. The LCRA and the PUC need to here from the public now, before it is too late.